播放地址

HD

雕像也会死亡

记录片法国1953

主演:让·内格罗尼弗朗索瓦·密特朗教宗庇护十二世Sugar Ray Robinson

导演:吉兰·克洛凯克里斯·马克阿伦·雷乃

剧照

雕像也会死亡 剧照 NO.1 雕像也会死亡 剧照 NO.2 雕像也会死亡 剧照 NO.3 雕像也会死亡 剧照 NO.4 雕像也会死亡 剧照 NO.5
更新时间:2023-09-16 10:48

详细剧情

  《雕像也会死亡》(Les statues meurent aussi,阿兰·雷乃、克里斯·马尔凯,1953年出品,27分钟)尖锐地批评了西方殖民主义对非洲传统艺术的戕害以及自称热爱非洲艺术的上等阶层的贪婪与伪善。本片的主角是来自黑非洲的人物雕像、面具和其他非洲艺术品,但是它们的演出场所并非黑人的故乡,而是白人的欧洲,艺术品市场和艺术品拍卖会是它们频频出没和滞留的中转地。这些本来被非洲部族用来抵抗死亡的面具和雕像,如今却呆在博物馆的橱窗里静静地死去。此时,画外音告诉我们:“当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化。”由于本片具有鲜明而强烈的社会批判意识,自拍竣之日起即遭到法国政府禁映,直到1963年才解禁。本片由长于剪辑的阿兰·雷乃操刀剪辑,由强于写作的克里斯·马尔凯撰写解说,充分发挥了两人各自的强项,可谓强强合作的结晶。
  This collaborative film, banned for more than a decade by French censors as an attack on French colonialism (and now available only in shortened form), is a deeply felt study of African art and the decline it underwent as a result of its contact with Western civilization. Marker's characteristically witty and thoughtful commentary is combined with images of a stark formal beauty in this passionate outcry against the fate of an art that was once integral to communal life but became debased as it fell victim to the demands of another culture.

长篇影评

1 ) 艺术如何死亡

理性的暴力对艺术扼杀。艺术有两个面向:观赏者的无成见的欣赏,以及艺术家的强烈的生命体验和创作体验。而康德等哲学家的论述只从观赏者出发。本雅明将卡夫卡的《塞壬的沉默》解读为原始艺术起源的狂热被技术中立化、驯化为文明的转变。而东方学式的知识/权力也只是这一暴力的一个变形,对艺术的“审美化”是一种殖民主义。 “当人死后,他们化作历史。雕像死后,则汇入艺术。这门死亡的植物学,即我们所谓的文化。” “我们,世界的殖民者,想让一切都对我们讲话:如那些野兽、死者和雕像。但这些雕像是哑巴,它们有嘴,但不说话。它们有眼睛,却不会看我们。” “但死亡不仅是一个人需要承受的,死亡还可以是人给予的。这是一只动物的死,栖身于这手掌的力量哪去了?这力量现在自由了,它四处游荡,它会纠缠生者,直到它变回原形,牺牲者所流的血最终变成这尊雕像,而正是这尊雕像,作为传说中变化过程的固定点,来安抚牺牲的痛苦,直到这些代表胜利的脸,完成修缮世界的工作。” “然后这些面孔也随之死去,被分类、贴上标签,保存在冰冷的橱窗和藏品里,它们成为艺术史的一部分,这是如天堂般的存在,在这里建立了最神秘的联系。我们在一个两千年前的非洲头像中认出了希腊,在多哥的洛戈伊面具中认出了日本,还有印度,苏美尔神像,我们的罗马基督,和我们的现代艺术。” “这些赝品首饰,本是探险家送给野蛮人来讨好他们的,结果反由黑人送回给我们来了,一种普遍的丑,取代了黑人艺术那独特的美。” “而这些我们令其在非洲消失的东西,相比我们掠走占为己有的,是微不足道的。” “这个国家本来只有交换和赠礼,我们引进了金钱,我们购买黑人劳动力,并蔑视之,我们购买黑人的艺术,并蔑视之。宗教舞蹈变成了表演,我们付钱给黑人,用他们的欢乐和热情为我们取乐。”

2 ) 殖民的学问,艺术的学问

1.
“当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化。”
(When men die, they enter into history. When statues die, they enter into art. This botany of death is what we call culture.)

在Alain Resnais 1955年的纪录片《雕像也会死亡》中,导演追溯了殖民者对非洲手工艺品的两个最主要的侵吞方式:变成人类学博物馆的展品或旅游商品。殖民者的眼光引发的自我反思的复杂形态——把『他者』据为己有,作为对自我的(反面)肯定。

Chris Marker典型知识分子的文本,旁白写得极佳。虽说如今看来可能有种过于学术的腔调,丧失了电影本身的美感,但毕竟是在严肃讨论。
这部《雕像也会死亡》因冒犯到法国的殖民政策,而被当局禁播了十年。
从影片中看到的是,西方殖民主义者利用这些黑非洲的艺术品,满足其上层阶层对于自身世界的反面想象,以“热爱”占有,但是:对于西方殖民主义者来说,“非洲手工艺品”既不是“艺术”,其本身也不具有“神圣性”,因为在它们所处的这个世界里,这些范畴毫无意义。
更悲切的是,对于被殖民者来说,这些面具原本保护他们抵抗死亡,然而在西方世界中却失效了。(The magic devised to protect them when they die on their own account is powerless when they die on our account.)

2.
电影过去半个世纪有余,这些观念是否应当改变呢?
如果不是这部电影,我确实对所谓西方文明对落后地区的介入感到一丝欣慰。7月在Tangier American Legation,美国唯一地处国外的National Historic Landmark,我很惊讶地发现Paul Bowles有整整一个大房间的陈列。他做的最主要贡献不是写了几本异域风情的书那么简单,而是在洛克菲勒基金的资助下,收录了70余卷的摩洛哥传统音乐,将所有主要的摩洛哥音乐元素都找遍了。——这种工作,当地人不仅仅缺乏保护意识,也缺资金和人员。
如今当然可以将这些记录归于民族志的范畴。而对于文明世界里的人来说,何尝不想摆脱伪善贪婪的标签?但是内心深处,仅仅只是博物馆参观者和艺术品购买者的我们,确实无法做到真正地认识了解接受另一个文明。

3 ) 概括

欣赏黑人艺术给白人带来愉悦,但黑人看到的会是代表自己文化的面孔(非洲面具,兰斯主教堂天使的笑容,代表着失去的世界和睦,存在于种族杂交与奴隶船之前)-宗教、祈祷、天地的公正、设计者拥有自由的想象力、非洲人民的生命力、他们有他们自己创造世界的方式、多种对比(树皮与雕像表皮、黑人皮肤与飞机上所见大地)、面具(对死亡的描绘)-各个国家的雕像死去被贴上标签封存-黑人艺术荣誉的同时却变成了死去的语言-宗教需求后是商业需求(白人购买者)-非洲美丽图案变为残次复制品(庸俗化、雕刻的头越来越像人、技艺的丧失)-白人用仪器治好了黑人的病,但却让黑人得了白人的病-黑人为白人死去时,冥像变为了死者纪念碑(黑人祖先的信仰消退了)-从白人驾驶飞机飞过的高度看,黑人过上了现代的生活(非洲成为绝佳的实验室)-伊斯兰教基督教对神像的敌对使非洲文化轰然倒塌(黑人基督艺术)-黑人艺术家斗争的艺术-工业冲垮自然-金钱代替交换和赠礼、购买并蔑视黑人劳动力-贬低黑人宗教艺术(舞蹈取乐、黑人玩偶)-黑人的运动是艺术(可玩弄白人自尊,但这时白人就要喊犯规、侮辱)-黑人艺术家用鼓一一偿还所受的委屈-黑人艺术曾是愿意认识世界、承担艺术变革的工具-死亡永远是丧失记忆之后将前往的国度

4 ) les statues meurent aussi [英文旁白全文]

wirtten by: Chris Marker 影片本身为法语,下文是对应的英语翻译,来自//wiki2.org/en/Les_statues_meurent_aussi,油管所用英字亦为该版本。 *部分单词旁出现的中文解释为笔者所加,方便阅览,如有错误欢迎指出* When men die, they enter into history. When statues die, they enter into art. This botany of death is what we call culture. That’s because the society of statues is mortal. One day, their faces of stone crumble and fall to earth. A civilization leaves behind itself these mutilated [毁坏的] traces like the pebbles [卵石] dropped by Petit Poucet [小拇指:童话故事中的人物,靠沿路丢弃白色石头并做记号,最终找到回家的路]. But history has devoured [吞噬] everything. An object dies when the living glance trained upon it disappears. And when we disappear, our objects will be confined to the place where we send black things: to the museum. Black art, we look at it as if it had its reason for being in the pleasure it gives us. The intentions of the black who created it, the emotions of the black who looks at it, all of that escapes us. Because they are written on wood, we take their thoughts for statues and we find the picturesque there, where a member of the black community sees the face of a culture. It is its smile of Reims that she gazes upon. It is the sign of a lost unity where art was the guarantee of an agreement between man and world. It is the sign of this gravity which delivers her, beyond métissage [杂交] and the slave ships, that ancient land of the ancestors, Africa. Here is the first division of Earth. Here is the fetus [胚胎] of the world. Here is Africa in the 11th century. 12th. 15th. 17th. From age to age, as its shape slowly unraveled [阐明], Africa was already the land of enigmas [难以理解之人事物]. Black was already the color of sin. Travelers’ tales spoke of monsters, flames, diabolical apparitions [恶魔显灵]. The whites already projected onto the blacks their own demons as a way to purge [净化] themselves of them. And yet, once beyond deserts and forests, which he believed to be bordering on the kingdom of Satan, the traveler discovered nations, palaces. Which song cradled this little princess? This little orange ripened in the caves of Benin [贝宁:位于非洲西部]? Which cult presided [主持、主掌] over this little republic of night? We don’t know any more. These great empires are now dead kingdoms to history. Contemporaries of Saint Louis, of Joan of Arc, they are even more unknown to us, than those of Sumer and Babylon. In the last century, the flames of conquerors turned this whole past into an absolute enigma. Black upon black, black battles in the night of time, the sinking has left us only with this beautiful striped wreckage which we interrogate [质询]. But it their history is an enigma, their shapes are not foreign to us. After the Frisians [弗里西人:古代位于现荷兰及德国内靠近北海南部地区的一族人,日耳曼民族中的一支少数民族], the monsters, the helmeted Atrides of Benin, all the vestments [圣衣、祭服] of Greece over a people of a sect [宗派], here are their Apollos from Aifé [艾弗:女武者,爱尔兰神话人物] which strike us with a familiar language. And it is fair that the black feel pride about a civilization which is as old as ours is. Our ancestors can look at each other face-to-face without looking down with empty eyes. But this brotherhood in death is not enough for us. It is much closer to us that we are going to find the true black art, that which puzzles us. The enigma begins right now, here, with this poor art, this art of hard wood, with this plate for divination, for instance. It is not very useful for us to call it religious object in a world where everything is religion, nor to speak of an art object in a world where everything is art. Art here begins in the spoon and ends up in the statue. And it is the same art. The wisdom in art and the ornament of a useful object like the head support and the useless beauty of the statue belong to two different orders. Here, this difference falls apart when we look closer. A chalice [圣餐杯] is not an art object, it is a cult object. This wooden cup is a chalice. Everything here is about cult. Cult of the world. When he makes the chair rest upon human feet, the black creates a nature in his image. Hence, every object is sacred because every creation is sacred. It recalls the creation of the world and continues it. The broadest activity cooperates with the world as a whole where everything is fine, where man affirms his reign over things by imprinting [铭刻] his mark and sometimes his countenance [面容、表情] upon them. Animal shapes like the one over this weaving bobbin [编织线轴], plant shapes like the ones over these ornamented boxes, all of creation moves in formation under the fingers of the black artist. God showed him the way, he imitates God and this is the way in which he invents man. Guardians of graves, sentinels [哨兵] of dead people, watchdogs of the invisible, these ancestors’ statues are not made for the cemetery. We put stones over our dead in order to prevent them from escaping. The black maintains them nearby to honor them and benefit from their power, in a basket overflowing with their bones. It is the dead who own all the wisdom and all the security. They are the roots of the living. And their eternal countenance takes, sometimes, the shape of a root. These roots flourish. The unvoluntary beauty of animals and plants shines in a girl’s face. And we can take its light for a smile, or else its glow for a tear, and feel touched, on the condition of knowing that these images ignore us, that they are from another world, that we have nothing to do in this gathering of ancestors who are not our ancestors. We want to see suffering, serenity, humor, when we know nothing. Colonizers of the world, we want everything to speak to us: the beast, the dead, the statues. And these statues are mute. They have mouths and don’t speak. They have eyes and don’t see us. And they are not so much idols as toys, serious toys, which have no value except for what they represent. This is less idolatry here than in our saints’ statues. Nobody worships these severe dolls. The black statue is not the God, it is the prayer. Prayer for motherhood, for the fertility of women, for the children’s beauty. It can be covered with ornaments which have the value of illuminations. It can also be rough, like this earthen ball protecting the harvest, or, still, connected to the earth, to death, by means of shape and by means of matter. This is the world of rigour [严厉、精确] , each things has its place within it. These heads don’t have to frightening, they have to be fair. Look carefully at their scars, this magnetic field where every shape from sky and earth comes into being. There’s no need for the object to exist and to serve. This overflow of creation, which deposits [沉淀] its signs like shells upon the smooth wall of the statue, is an overflow of imagination, it is freedom, turning of the sun, flower knot, water curve, fork of the trees, one after the other, the techniques are mixed, the wood subtly imitates the fabric, the fabric takes its motives from earth. One realizes that this creation has no limits, that everything communicates, and that from its planets to its atoms this world of rigour comprises by its turning the world of beauty. A god made these gestures. The god who wove this flesh taught them by its turn to weave the cloth and its gesture sends back every second to the weaving of the world. And the world is the cloth of the gods, where they received man. Try to distinguish here which one is the Earth and which one is the cloth, which one is the black skin and which one is the Earth seen from an airplane, which one is the bark [树皮] of the tree and that of the statue. Here, man is never separated from the world, the same strength nourishes every fiber. Those fibers, among which, the foremost sacrilege [亵渎神灵], lifting the Earth’s skirt, has discovered…death. Beast’s mask. Man’s mask. Mask which participates of both beast and man. House-mask. Face-mask. Pierrot [哑剧男丑角] of the rivers. Harlequin [滑稽角色、丑角] of the forest. These masks fight against death. They unveil that which it wants to hide. Because the familiarity of the dead leads to the domestication [驯养、教化] of death, to the government of death by means of spells, to the transmission of death, to the charming of death by means of the magic of shells. And the sorcerer captures in his mirror the images of this country of death, where one goes by losing one’s memory. But, winner of the body, death cannot do anything against the vital strength spread through every being and which composes its double. Through life, this double takes sometimes the form of the shadow or of the reflection in the water and more than one man gets angry for being hit right there. But death is not only something one bears, it is something one gives. Here is the death of an animal. Where has the strength which inhabited this hand gone? It is free now. It wanders. It will torment the living until it has taken on its former appearance. It is to this appearance that the blood of sacrifice is addressed. And it is this appearance which is fixed in these legendary metamorphoses in order to appease [使平息、使满足] it until these winning faces are done repairing the fabric of the world. And then they die, in their turn. Classified, labelled, conserved in the ice of showcases and collections, they enter into the history of art, paradise of the forms where the most mysterious relationships are established. We recognize Greece in an old African head of 2000 years; Japan in a mask from Logoué; and still India; Sumerian idols; our Roman Christ; or our modern art. But at the same time it receives this title of glory, black art becomes a dead language and that which is born over its death is the jargon [行话、术语] of decadence [堕落、腐败]. Its religious requirements are followed by commercial requirements. And given that the white is the buyer, given that demand outstrips supply, given that it is necessary to go fast, black art becomes indigenous handicraft. Each time even more degraded replicas of the beautiful pictures invented by African culture are fabricated. Here, the village is vulgarized [通俗化、庸俗化], the technique is impoverished [穷困的、用尽了的]. In the country where every form had its signification, where the gracefulness of a curve was a declaration of love to the world, one becomes accustomed to an art of bazaar. These fake jewels, which the explorers offer to the savages [未开化的人] in order to please them, end up being sent back to us by the blacks. The particular beauty of black art is substituted by a general ugliness. An art where the objects become bibelots [小摆设], a cosmopolitan art. An art of the flower-pot, the paperweight and the souvenir pen-rack, where one sees, transparently, the Tower of Babel. Also an art of portraits. Henceforth incapable of expressing the essential, the sculptor seeks after resemblance. We taught him not to carve farther than the tip of his nose. But that which we make disappear from Africa doesn't count for much among us compared to what we have in store. That's because we are the Martians of Africa. We disembark [登录] from our planet with our way of seeing, with our white magic, and with our machines. We cure the black of his diseases, it is certain. He catches ours, it is certain as well. Who loses and who wins in the exchange has been of no concern whatsoever. The magic devised to protect them when they die on their own account is powerless when they die on our account. Against the Christian paradise and the lay immortality, the cult of ancestors evaporates [消失、不复存在], the monument to the dead substitutes for the funeral statue. All of this dominated by the whites, who see things from their heights, which rise above the contradictions of reality. From these heights, Africa seems orderly, rich, covered with people from modern cities, filled with its concrete igloos [雪块砌成的圆顶小屋] like white blood cells of civilization. From such heights, Africa is a wonderful laboratory where it is possible to partially prefabricate the kind of good black dreamt up by the good whites. Then all this protective apparatus which gave sense and form to black art dissolves and disappears. It is the whites who intend to take on the role of the ancestors. The true statue for protection, exorcism [驱魔] and fecundity [多产、肥沃] hecenforth is their silhouette. Everything unites against black art. Caught in a pass between Islam, enemy of the images, and Christianity, which burns idols, African culture collapses. In order to lift it up again, the Church attempts a métissage: the black-christian art. But each of the two influences destroys the other one. And this flawed wedding makes Catholicism in Africa lose its exuberance [活跃、强壮], its glow, everything that blacks, indeed, anyone had recognized in Europe. Temporal power practices the same austerity [艰苦朴素、苦行、禁欲生活]. All that was pretext [托辞] for works of art is replaced be it clothing, symbolic gestures, intrigues, or talking. One says "yes, yes, yes". Sometimes, one says "no"! There, that is the black artist who says it. And so a new form of art shows up: the art of fighting. Art of transition for a period of transition. Art of the present time, between a lost greatness and another to conquer. Art of the provisional [临时的], whose ambition is not to last, but to witness. Here the problem of the subject is not posed. The subject is this naturally ungrateful earth this naturally troublesome climate and inside work, at an unfathomable [高深莫测的] scale, the rhythm of the factory confronting the rhythm of nature: Ford meets Tarzan. The subject is this black man, mutilated from his culture and without contact with our culture. His work is able to provide neither spiritual nor social sustenance [实物、营养、养料], he works for nothing, his reward is nothing but a derisory [嘲笑的、嘲弄的] salary. Into this country of gift and exchange, we have introduced money. We buy the blacks' work and we degrade it. We buy their art and we degrade it. The religious dance becomes spectacle. We pay the blacks to give us the comedy of their joy and their fervor [热情]. In this way, by the side of the black-slave, appears a second figure, the black-puppet. His strength serves us, his prowess [勇猛] amuses us, on the side, he serves us as well. Nations which are endowed with racist traditions find it all the more natural to trust to men of color the concern for the nation's olympic glories. But a moving black is still black art. And in sport the black can find, hoping for the best, a good terrain for mystifying the white's pride. The white does not always appreciate the joke. It happens that he cries "foul" when things are turning out bad. If a black boxer manages to defeat a white one in a country marked by Hitlerian racism they try to break him down with blows of menacing insults and projectiles [射弹]: he had better stay in his place. And when it's no longer for play, when the blacks, for instance, join the labor struggle, it's the blows of guns and batons [警棍] that break up the demonstrations. This climate of premeditated [预谋的] menace drives the black artist into a new metamorphosis and, in the ring, or in an orchestra, his role consists in returning the blows that his brother has received in the street. And witness here, far from the appearances of black art: for the art of communion, the art of invention finds accomodations within this world of loneliness and the machine. The man who had impressed his mark upon things accomplishes now empty gestures. What we have is this, from the bottom of this loneliness, that which will create a new community. Black art was the instrument of a will to grasp the world and also of the will which undertook to change its form. Look well at this technique, which frees mankind from magic. It presents sometimes with magic a strange relationship of gestures. It is always against death which one fights. Science, as magic, admits the necessity of the sacrifice of the animal. The virtue of blood. The harnessing [利用] of malevolent [恶毒的] forces. The sorcerer captures images every day. And death is always a country where one goes forth at the cost of one's memories. No. We are not redeemed by shutting off the blacks within their own celebrity. There would be nothing to prevent us from being, together, the inheritors of two pasts if that equality could be recovered in the present. Less remarked, it is prefigured [预兆] by the only equality denied to no one......that of repression. Because there is no rupture [决裂、断裂] between African civilization and ours. The faces of black art fell off from the same human face, like the serpent's skin. Beyond their dead forms, we recognize this promise, common to all the great cultures, of a man who is victorious over the world. And, white or black, our future is made of this promise. THE END

5 ) 博物馆和电影

在WJT Mitchell的“Empire and Objecthood”中,他追溯了艺术和帝国的关系。他写道:审美评判的整套语言,尤其是艺术品与普通物件的区分,早已被殖民话语充斥。(the whole language of aesthetic judgement, especially of the distinction between art and objecthood, is already saturated with colonial discourse。” 书中他论述,将被拯救的(the redeemed)和被诅咒的(the damned)区分开来,即是美学的核心。帝国将殖民地的“坏物品”同它自己本身的纯洁的、文明的物品做出分别。

那么按照这种逻辑,博物馆这一专门为了展示艺术品和其他“不平凡”的物品的空间就无法避免地被牵扯进有关殖民的争论中。博物馆的展品很多都是从别的文明抢夺而得,被放下异国的美学标准下审视,这一现象在人类学博物馆中更甚。那么,非洲艺术如何存在于博物馆以及博物馆以外的空间?这正是《雕像也会死亡》所探讨的问题。

把任何一件物品置于博物馆中即切断了它和生命的关联,宣告了这件物品的死亡。De Groof概括了非洲研究学者们的观点:将非洲物品纳入博物馆中不仅仅意味着将非洲视作遥远而神秘的土地,更是将非洲与西方从时间维度上分隔。非洲代表了西方的“当代祖先(Contemporary Ancestors)。通过把非洲塑造成原始的形象,西方明确的创造并定义了一个“他者(the other),”从而完成了自我定义。如果说人类学的展示已经使得非洲文化物品死去,那么将他们审美化则是更进一步扼杀它们。

因此,影片宣扬一种对非洲艺术的复兴。这是一个现在时的、博物馆外的复兴。新的生机勃勃的非洲艺术正是对反殖民和政治不平等的抗争。死亡的雕塑变形成为其他形式的非洲艺术:例如街头抗议中的黑人身体。

我们可以进一步跳出博物馆的物理定义,一个展览空间,而把它抽象为一个观看主体与客体的关系:站在玻璃展览柜之外的人注视柜子里面的物品。这一视觉关系和电影本身非常相似:屏幕外面的人注视屏幕里面的世界。在人类学博物馆以及传统民族志电影中,某种对于西方陌生的文化被殖民者观看,前者是被沉默的,后者是享有话语权的。《雕塑也会死亡》在内容上拒绝了博物馆这一实体空间,在形式上也挑战了西方习惯性的殖民注视。

《雕塑也会死亡》的开头便颠覆了西方的观看主体位置。“在我们消失后,我们的物品会被放到现在放置非洲物品的地方:博物馆。”伴随着这样的旁白,我们看到一个想象中的展览:人类照片下面配有“祖先画像”的注释;一组奇奇怪怪的物体被标注为“实用艺术,来源未知。”一个后人类社会对于人类的误读正是西方对于非洲误读的比喻。

博物馆展览物品,电影展览画面。那么在这个反殖民的“电影博物馆”中,什么样的画面被展出了呢?我们看到电影中不止有非洲的画面。《雕塑也会死亡》的后半段将重点转移到西方的殖民行为:白人视察艺术摆件的制作、为黑人做医疗检查、乘飞机和汽车巡逻非洲街道。因此被审视的不再是非洲,而正是西方对非洲的作为。

也许在博物馆无法走出其殖民主义的原罪时,电影可以提供一种新的思路,将生命重新归还于非洲文化。

W.J.T. Mitchell, “Empire & Objecthood”

Matthias De Groof, “Statues Also Die -- But their Death is Not the Final Word”

6 ) 概括

欣赏黑人艺术给白人带来愉悦,但黑人看到的会是代表自己文化的面孔(非洲面具,兰斯主教堂天使的笑容,代表着失去的世界和睦,存在于种族杂交与奴隶船之前)-宗教、祈祷、天地的公正、设计者拥有自由的想象力、非洲人民的生命力、他们有他们自己创造世界的方式、多种对比(树皮与雕像表皮、黑人皮肤与飞机上所见大地)、面具(对死亡的描绘)-各个国家的雕像死去被贴上标签封存-黑人艺术荣誉的同时却变成了死去的语言-宗教需求后是商业需求(白人购买者)-非洲美丽图案变为残次复制品(庸俗化、雕刻的头越来越像人、技艺的丧失)-白人用仪器治好了黑人的病,但却让黑人得了白人的病-黑人为白人死去时,冥像变为了死者纪念碑(黑人祖先的信仰消退了)-从白人驾驶飞机飞过的高度看,黑人过上了现代的生活(非洲成为绝佳的实验室)-伊斯兰教基督教对神像的敌对使非洲文化轰然倒塌(黑人基督艺术)-黑人艺术家斗争的艺术-工业冲垮自然-金钱代替交换和赠礼、购买并蔑视黑人劳动力-贬低黑人宗教艺术(舞蹈取乐、黑人玩偶)-黑人的运动是艺术(可玩弄白人自尊,但这时白人就要喊犯规、侮辱)-黑人艺术家用鼓一一偿还所受的委屈-黑人艺术曾是愿意认识世界、承担艺术变革的工具-死亡永远是丧失记忆之后将前往的国度

7 ) 文化

一直不知道什么是文化,看了这部电影纪录片,我才明白,人死后成为历史,物死后变更为艺术,日月交替,能传承下来的就形成了文化。同为人,只是肤色不同,白人哪来的自信碾压黑人?碾压他们的文化?碾压他们的精神?奴役!欺压!同住在一个星球上,不应该共享文化吗?不应该敬畏那些被掠夺的珍藏在你们博物馆里的黑人文化吗?这是1953年的电影,到今天2022年了,种族歧视依然存在,悲乎?怪哉!

短评

115

5分钟前
  • 喘喘
  • 推荐

“当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化。”

8分钟前
  • YiQiao
  • 推荐

论文电影。感觉其实不如雷乃后面的[夜与雾]或者[全世界的记忆],这个题目夹杂的东西太多,除了黑人艺术之外还有殖民主义的面向,但是它又拒绝被简单地定义。

11分钟前
  • 胤祥
  • 推荐

雷乃的离开和雕塑一样,进入了艺术本身。

16分钟前
  • 黑狗成
  • 力荐

今天重看了《堤》,然后和这个片连一起放。片子使用大量对非洲民俗雕塑的静止特写,恍惚觉得这效果真的跟堤一样,像是凝视无声的控诉... 雷乃的大师级剪辑+马克的大师级文案,片子在批评所谓“热爱艺术”的上流社会方面效果很犀利

19分钟前
  • 米粒
  • 推荐

阿伦·雷乃与克里斯·马克联手创作的反殖民主义论文电影,解构与反思博物馆中观看与审视异域文化的机制。不仅关于非洲的艺术品的起源(模仿大地与草木的图案,生活、宗教与审美合一,非洲文化与自然生态的交融)及今日的异化(大工业批量生产),后半段还有不少西方人与非洲人间冲突的影像,直露地呼吁改变殖民主义对他国文化的蔑视与践踏。| “当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化。” (8.0/10)

21分钟前
  • 冰红深蓝
  • 推荐

14 MAR 2010 (4+) 一直不知道原來chris marker有份,其實想來也不意外。很喜歡兩次從藝術品的角度看我們的片段,一次在藝術館,一次在藝廊之中,後半部份講非洲當代藝術工作坊生產很過癮,也幽其時的白人世界一默,特別是購買非洲人舞蹈助慶的一句旁白,最夠抵死啜核。

25分钟前
  • 艾莎妮達
  • 推荐

以艺术的包装探讨传统流失,文化侵略,种族歧视

29分钟前
  • somnambuleNRR6
  • 推荐

1953年就能拍出这样的电影

31分钟前
  • 散木
  • 力荐

当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化

32分钟前
  • UrthónaD'Mors
  • 还行

这片子探讨的东西太多了吧 西方人制造和购买的非洲艺术形象 跳开非洲的更加广泛的强与弱的艺术关系问题到现在不但没好转反而愈演愈烈

33分钟前
  • 琧婯
  • 还行

马凯谴责西方把非洲当成量产黑人的实验场,雷乃干脆将经过白人规划后的非洲聚落的航拍图,跟玻璃罩中的小白鼠的镜头剪辑到一起。这种将其他的文明改造成西方视角下理想的社会的行为,跟N. H. Clement在《法国浪漫主义》中提到的“高贵野蛮人(noble savage)”情结背后的逻辑非常类似,称赞另一个大陆的野蛮人具有纯真、高贵的品质,实际上是一种西方中心论的视角,因为西方社会中存在的种种问题——道德堕落、人心败坏——给人造成了难以承受的压力,所以才需要将自己对理想社会、返璞归真的愿景投射到野蛮人身上,这是一种不愿直面现实的逃避。传教士甚至赞扬美洲土著居民能够以顽强的毅力忍耐白人的殖民统治。英国在美洲规划的一些城市是以教堂为中心的,各个生活区域也经过了规划,新大陆沦为了白人的积木乐园。

35分钟前
  • Gymnopedie
  • 力荐

法國 1953

39分钟前
  • PEEEEE
  • 力荐

当人死后,他们化作历史;雕像死后,则汇入艺术。雕像以自己的死亡来对抗时间的永恒。记忆 时间 遗忘。

40分钟前
  • Eco
  • 力荐

【私人影记】【阿伦·雷乃作品全集4】鲜明而强烈的批评意识。从不同角度展现的人物雕像告诉我们Alain是多么精于剪辑,而克利斯的文案又做得如此激情豪仗。“当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化。”

45分钟前
  • 大灰狼的兔
  • 推荐

“当人死去的时候,他便进入了历史;当这些雕像死去的时候,它们进入了艺术;这种关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化。”法国禁片,批判殖民主义及附庸风雅的伪善。拍摄人物雕像时,特写便有了控诉之意,更何况有雕像视角对博物馆游客的审视。依旧是画面拼贴+诗性旁白,最后呈现纪录性历史片段

49分钟前
  • 谋杀游戏机
  • 推荐

好偏颇的观点,有点做作。摄影和剪辑很值得一看。没有字幕,旁白全没懂。

53分钟前
  • 桃子
  • 还行

起初以为只是讲艺术的,并不是啦

56分钟前
  • vivi
  • 推荐

素材王子,摄影达人,剪辑大师,阿伦雷乃。

59分钟前
  • 希尼莫
  • 推荐

关于死亡的学问,我们最后称之为文化

1小时前
  • 无心
  • 推荐

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved

Baidu
map