HD

打工好汉

剧情片美国1986

主演:迈克尔·基顿米密·罗杰斯约翰·特托罗渡边戈登乔治·温迪特山村聪夏野萨博

导演:朗·霍华德

播放地址

剧照

打工好汉 剧照 NO.1 打工好汉 剧照 NO.2 打工好汉 剧照 NO.3 打工好汉 剧照 NO.4 打工好汉 剧照 NO.5 打工好汉 剧照 NO.6
更新时间:2023-12-07 00:06

详细剧情

美国一个小镇宾州,大部分镇民是在一家汽车零件装配工厂上班,整个镇的繁荣富裕维系于此。然而经济不景气,使得该工厂就要关门大吉。史帝文生是这家工厂的员工,为了自己、为了全镇,他跳出来去游说一家日本的汽车公司,买下工厂,好保留大家的饭碗。   俗语说:「杀头生意有人做,赔本生意可是没人干。」日本人接掌美国工厂,当然希望赚得足够的利润。而关键不仅在于日本人的先进技术移入,也在于美国员工全力以赴,使生产线更有效率。   当日本的管理阶层,遇上美国的劳工阶层会是怎样的文化冲突局面?

长篇影评

1 ) Working Class Man (Gung Ho) (1986)(网上复制的)

If you create a user account, you can add your own review of this DVD Released 9-Sep-2003 This review is sponsored by BUY IT Details At A Glance General Extras Category Comedy None Rating Year Of Production 1986 Running Time 107:28 RSDL / Flipper No/No Cast & Crew Start Up Menu Region Coding 4 Directed By Ron Howard Studio Distributor Paramount Home Entertainment Starring Michael Keaton Gedde Watanabe George Wendt Mimi Rogers John Turturro Soh Yamamura Sab Shimono Case ? RPI $24.95 Music Thomas Newman Video Audio Pan & Scan/Full Frame None English Dolby Digital 5.1 (448Kb/s) Widescreen Aspect Ratio 2.05:1 16x9 Enhancement Video Format 576i (PAL) Original Aspect Ratio 2.35:1 Miscellaneous Jacket Pictures No Subtitles None Smoking Yes Annoying Product Placement No Action In or After Credits No NOTE: The Profanity Filter is ON. Turn it off here. Plot Synopsis This film is called Gung Ho in the US, but I guess they thought that title wouldn't be understood elsewhere, so we get it as Working Class Man (yes, the Jimmy Barnes song does appear, under the closing credits). I think that I first saw this film on video, shortly after it had played in the cinemas. The film is set in Hadleyville, which is basically Small Town, USA. The town is dying, because this is the late 1980s, when the USA is going through the most painful part of its transition from industrial to post-industrial society. Hadleyville used to have two large factories, one turning out underwear and one making cars. The underwear factory closed, leaving the town dependent on the car plant as the major employer in the town. Now the car plant has been shut down for months, and the town is fading fast. People are leaving, shops are closing. In a last-ditch effort, they send the factory foreman, Hunt Stevenson (Michael Keaton) to Japan to try and interest Assan Motors in taking over the plant. After a mildly offensive (in today's terms) trip through Japan, which includes him barging into places where he doesn't belong, Hunt returns home, convinced that he has failed. But he hasn't. Assan Motors sends a jet-full of executives, led by Kazihiro-san (Gedde Watanabe, who puts in an excellent performance) to take over the plant. This film is about culture shock, and it runs both ways. The jingoistic Americans see the Japanese as uptight, unreasonable, dictatorial, and strange. The Japanese see the Americans as lazy, egotistical, not team-players, and strange. The process is not helped by Hunt's appointment as employee liaison. Hunt lies to both sides, and does next to nothing in terms of helping them to understand one another — not because he is intending to deceive them, but because he is cowardly, afraid to tell them things they don't want to hear. As matters deteriorate, he comes up with the bright idea of setting a challenge: if the plant can turn out 15,000 cars in one month, the Japanese will raise wages and guarantee full employment (if you're young, you've probably never heard the term "full employment"). Now things get interesting. Unfortunately, Hunt lets the employees think that there's a lesser target for which they'll receive a smaller raise. Add to this a suggestion of nepotism, in that Kazihiro has a second-in-command called Saito (Sab Shimone), who is Kazihiro's boss's nephew. Saito is reporting back to Mr Sakamoto (Soh Yamamura), who is reporting back to his uncle on how things are going. This is Kazihiro's last chance: he failed in his last job, and was sent through a retraining programme for shamed executives. It's amusing to see the portrayed American attitude to a policy of zero defects — something that is now common. I found this film rather funny back in the late 1980s. Now I find it quite dated, and occasionally a bit offensive, but I think that is rampant political correctness at work. If you watch carefully, this film gives as much time to making points about small-town American mentality as to pointing out oddities in Japanese culture. It's given to George Wendt to display the worst intolerance, and it is clear that his behaviour is not approved of by the others. All in all, this is a dated comedy, but still amusing, providing you view it in the context of the culture that produced it. Don't wish to see plot synopses in the future? Change your configuration. Transfer Quality Video This transfer is presented at an aspect ratio of about 2.00:1, 16x9 enhanced. The original theatrical aspect ratio was 2.35:1, shot in Panavision. This is better than pan-and-scan 1.33:1, better than 1.78:1, but still not the original aspect ratio. Still, there are no obvious mis-framings, so it's not too bad. The image is uniformly quite soft. Shadow detail is dreadful — darker shades drop off into black far too quickly. Film grain does not appear to be a big problem, but it could be a contributor to the softness of the transfer. There is no low-level noise. Colour isn't too bad, but comes across as dull and lifeless. There are no colour-related artefacts, but there are some scenes that feature over-hot whites, particularly at the start of the film. There are plenty of small film artefacts: spots, flecks, and chips; but they are generally untroubling. There is only a little aliasing and just hints of moiré, but there are no MPEG artefacts. There are no subtitle tracks. There are some subtitles burned into the image for some of the Japanese dialogue — they are easy to read, and seem well-timed to the dialogue, but without the ability to speak Japanese I cannot assess their accuracy. The disc is single-sided and single layered. That means there is no layer change. Video Ratings Summary Sharpness Shadow Detail Colour Grain/Pixelization Film-To-Video Artefacts Film Artefacts Overall Audio The soundtrack is only provided in English. Strangely, it is Dolby Digital 5.1 at 448 kbps — strangely, because there's no use of the subwoofer (except in the 4th of July fireworks), no significant use of the surrounds, and next to no stereo image. Heck, a Dolby Digital 1.0 soundtrack would have been adequate to convey what we get here. There's a little distortion in one or two places, but it's quite minor. The dialogue is clear and easy to understand. There are no obvious audio sync problems. Thomas Newman has provided an adequate score, although more than a little of it sounds somewhat clichéd. Audio Ratings Summary Dialogue Audio Sync Clicks/Pops/Dropouts Surround Channel Use Subwoofer Overall Extras There are no extras. Not a single one. Menu The menu is static and silent, and features only Play and Scene Selection. Despite the movie being 16x9 enhanced, this menu is not, so it looks too wide on a 16x9 display. R4 vs R1 NOTE: To view non-R4 releases, your equipment needs to be multi-zone compatible and usually also NTSC compatible. The Region 1 version of this movie (released over a year ago) is reported as being 1.78:1 aspect ratio on one site (which is worse than this disc), and 2.10:1 on another (which might be what we have here) — I suspect that the latter is more accurate. The R1 disc has English and French soundtracks, and English subtitles — that's more than the R4 — but it doesn't make enough difference to make me give the win to the R1. Summary A movie that's pretty much past its use-by date, but that still offers a few laughs. The transfer is sub-standard, though. The video quality is poor. The audio quality is adequate. The extras are utterly absent. Ratings (out of 5) Video Audio Extras Plot Overall ©

2 ) 考验智商的环节

相信本片最后的日本老大,终于认可1.5万辆,从而给予美方工人全员加薪的人,确实智商出了问题!
这么严厉严格要求质量与数量的老大,怎么可能轻言放弃?
其实,他在最后一秒,施舍了一大堆恩赐给眼前的“废材”们,目的只有一个:日本车的美国本土化市场,从而比竞争对手,更多、更快地占领美国市场。

当时日美经济背景资料如下:
二战以后,日本经济快速增长。到了70年代,日本经济进一步稳定发展。
与此同时,欧美发达国家却由于政府长期过分干预经济、低效率的国有福利体系、石油危机多种原因而陷入了经济停滞。
世界范围内,日本经济可谓一枝独秀。日本制造的工业产品行销世界各地,所向无敌。
美国几乎只有招架之功。底特律的汽车业尤其损失惨重。
美国汽车工人们天天唠唠叨叨地把日本人挂在嘴边骂个没完。
1985年,美日英德法签订了著名的“广场协议”,规定美元实现贬值。这样也就是提升了日元的币值。“广场协议”签订以后的几年,日元币值差不多上升了三倍。
于是,手里拿着大把美元的日本人开始在美国大肆购买。尤其是美国资产的购买,让美利坚人深感不安!
到了1989年,日本人购买美国资产达到了顶峰。这一年的6月,索尼公司宣布,他们以34亿美元的价格成功购买了美国娱乐业巨头、也是美国文化的象征之一——哥伦比亚影片公司。此举是索尼公司由制造业转向娱乐业的战略行动之一。此前,三菱公司已经以14亿美元购买了更重要的美国国家象征——洛克菲勒中心。这个代表着美国资本主义进入全盛时期的伟大建筑现在属于日本人了。

3 ) 本质上还是不错的片子

主题是一家开设在美国小镇的日本汽车工厂的发展历程

文化差异刻画的很细腻:日本人严谨的企业文化和追求完美的精神,美国人的个人主义和随意散漫。从片中开始觉得日本人是压抑但是却充满热情的,也的确,他们确实是靠着这一股子二杆子精神从二战后的战败国渐渐变成经济强国。

但是不得不说:一些情节的设置还是太幼稚。比如最后结局里大BOSS让自己的侄子去扫地,编剧为了追求大圆满的结局未免太刻意了些。
总体来说还是不错的

4 ) 技术上并无毛病,只弱在最后一步棋

我小时候在正大综艺一类的节目里看到这种日本的胶囊旅馆时,就渴望居住其中。

我特别喜欢紧凑、高效的空间。

现在我对胶囊旅馆没有向往了。

毕竟,小时候是不懂 sex 的需求的。

而且,我因为某个经历,还生出了一点幽闭空间恐惧的毛病。

《工合》是一部技术没有任何毛病的电影。

对了,片名 Gung Ho,是「工合」,不是「干活」。

维基百科上有词源解释://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gung-ho

一部讲美日文化冲突的电影,片名用了一个来自中文的词,隐患就已经埋下了。

但技术上真没毛病。很多细节甚至是教科书式的。

比如这样的台词:

「喂,是我呀,汉特 · 斯蒂文森……不,是『斯蒂文森』。……你肯定认识我啦。……是啊,我们一起上过幼儿园的。……不是,不是我跟你。我是跟你表弟一起上过幼儿园,他睡午觉的时候老是提起你。……没错。没错。听我说,我给你打电话的原因是……」……「我可以来找你啊,我现在开车过来的话,只要二十九个小时就可以到你那儿了。」

(仔细一品,「只要二十九个小时就可以到你那儿了」宜改为「明天下午就能到你那儿了」。「二十九小时」用的是「细节数字」的公式,但细琢磨会显得假了,因为这个时间的计算是复杂的,且包含途中休息等不确定因素。如果说「明天下午」,路程之远一样彰显,但真实感强了很多。)

时过境迁,今天再看这部电影,我们可以很轻松地把中国人代入片中的日本人角色。

毕竟,美国人的工作效率,跟东亚哪一国都没法比。

片中对日本文化的描写还是浮于表面的,所以抓不住美日文化冲突的灵魂。

这当然就导致了编剧写到结局时的困境。

这样营造的矛盾冲突,如何靠主角解决?

最后,在一百零七分钟的正常铺垫之后,编剧只能让日本大老板毫无征兆地转变,才能解决问题。

所以毫无力量。

其实片中有力量的片段很多。

迈克尔 · 基顿的几次演讲,都是教科书式的台词撰写。起承转合,推进有度。有时欲擒故纵,有时树上开花,有时顺水推舟……不是故作高深的「高智商」戏,不是软绵绵凑字数的口水文,不是强行喊口号的打鸡血。就是实打实的生活智慧。

电影嘛,很多时候都是这样。

技术上成功了,电影不一定能成功。

但技术上若不成功,电影几乎不可能成功。

《工合》至少留下了许多值得后辈研习的东西。

P.S. 有个角色姓 Googleman。在1986年的当时,人们对这个名字当然没有什么特别的感觉。

5 ) 从来就没有人人平等,人就是动物

发展中国家的工人假如都像欧美那样注重生活质量注重亲情友情,那么劳动力成本一定会猛涨,像巴西南非一样陷入中等收入陷阱。可是这些发展中国家的人就活该被牺牲吗?妈的,除此还真是别无他法。要么牺牲几代人走向发达国家,要么困在中等收入之中社会逐渐混乱。

从来都没有人人平等。人和动物没什么区别,社会其实就是金字塔,一切社会革命有哪个真正实现了理想的内容?没有的。因为这些都违反了自然定律。那到底该怎样活?参考动物世界吧。

||

对话摘录 “我没办法把它组装好”“我今晚没空”“我希望儿子明天醒来就能看到它”“...”“和博”“我在工作,我没空!!”“为什么美国的爸爸就有空???”“为什么?因为他们的工作成效烂透了”妻子摔东西。丈夫“巴嘎”和博:“日本工人加班不是为了工资,是为了公司”日本人看到美国老婆对丈夫瞪眼看呆了哈哈哈哈

6 ) 美国人眼中的东方“干活”文化

这部电影拍摄于1986年,距今已有27年历史。之所以能大浪淘沙般把这部电影挖出来,是因为纽约时报上的一篇文章。文章在讲述“双汇收购史密斯菲尔德”时,扩展到当前中国赴美投资热,又回忆起80年代的日本赴美投资潮,而Gung Ho这部电影就是当年好莱坞记录那个年代的代表作之一。 其实,Gung Ho这个英文词来源于汉语,是“干活”的音译。清末中国穷苦劳工在美国内战结束后被掳至美国修筑铁路,这些劳工的吃苦耐劳精神让美国人印象深刻,而劳工们经常说的“干活”(Gung Ho)一词就被老美用来形容做事积极高效,后来发展出引申义狂热。 不过,Gung Ho这个明显具有舶来色彩的英文词显然与做事积极高效的内涵不完全一致,这个词还包含了个人服从集体,做事整齐划一的意思。 这部电影取名为Gung Ho,也确实很好地描绘了什么是具有中国特色,特别是日本特色的干活。现在看来,拍摄质量平庸,许多空洞无谓的镜头;文化印象刻板,日本人一丝不苟到像机器人一般的工作精神,一起下河洗澡反映出的集体主义;桥段设计生硬,老婆生孩子也要在工厂加班的夸张情节。尽管如此,我相信当年美国人就是这么看待一个崛起的日本经济,现在的美国人也许依然这么看待正在崛起的中国经济。 电影中有一段在酒吧的情节,上班时压抑的日本人到酒吧就完全变了另一个人,酗酒、喧哗、狂舞,而老美在酒吧仍局限于休闲社交,狂欢仅限私人家中的派对,而不在公共场合。更有趣的是,日本经理酒后吐真言说:“我麻烦大了,生产任务完不成,我的事业要毁了。”他的美国下属安慰他说:“我的麻烦才大,我跟工人们说产量只要提高就可以加薪,即便完不成预定的更高目标。”日本经理听后狂笑说:“你说得没错啊!”美国经理一听乐了,以为日本经理同意产量提高就可以加薪,结果日本经理接着幽幽来了一句:“你的麻烦确实比我大,呵呵!”

短评

戏剧化夸张化,但是也有细致的一面。

5分钟前
  • 空時計
  • 推荐

考验智商的环节。相信本片最后的日本老大,终于认可1.5万辆,从而给予美方工人全员加薪的人,确实智商出了问题!

7分钟前
  • 老羊
  • 推荐

International Business 课的期中quiz。。。

10分钟前
  • 阿玖
  • 还行

从《美国工厂》的评论里来的,有意思,跟前者对照看特别讽刺。

13分钟前
  • 啊酷呐,吗嗒嗒
  • 推荐

前車之鑒,跨國企業的難題,尤其是製造業。對正在美國設廠作業的台積電來說會怎麼應對呢?

16分钟前
  • 疯神榜
  • 推荐

因文化差異而造成笑話,尤其兩走極端的美日文化,即使三十年後這話題已不合時宜,還是覺得很有趣,何況由頭髮仍濃密的 Michael Keaton 主演,絕對是輕鬆懷舊電影夜的上佳之選。

19分钟前
  • eyHanAKo
  • 还行

stereotypes and intercultural differences 联合烹调出来的无聊电影啊…… via organizational communication class

20分钟前
  • 猫栗子二
  • 还行

专门讲述商业文化差异的片子好像不多,本片上映于全球化浪潮初期,美国产业大转移如火如荼,可以说很是站在流行前端了。但是故事在大反转时就不合理性了,充分的说明老美当时还很不理解日本人,故事也只是徒有其表

21分钟前
  • 中雪君
  • 推荐

这中文的名字也太雷人了吧?? watanabe其实是个美人,真是岁月如刀啊....看在86年拍的水平的份上,4星吧. 有一段特别经典:watanabe和妻子吵架以后,接到老板批评的电话后十分泄气,妻子小鸟依人地钻进他怀里.....MD,好想让人冲上去保护她...............完了,我没治了.

24分钟前
  • MaxD
  • 推荐

看了一圈短评,果然大家都是上课要看的电影,,,老师竟然要求对这电影写出篇论文来,真是欢乐无限多,今年到我家

28分钟前
  • 死一般的感觉
  • 推荐

也算是泡沫时代的喜剧

31分钟前
  • 本多
  • 推荐

基顿轻松自如的俏皮表演拯救了这部烂片,日本人的形象过于刻板,美日员工的矛盾解决得有点儿戏,所以也只有走喜剧路线行得通?2019年的《美国工厂》,宾州变成俄亥俄,日资转为福耀,工会还是争议点,现实很冷,没那么可笑。

33分钟前
  • hoffman
  • 还行

最后也太理想化了hahahaha 没有曹德旺好看!!

35分钟前
  • 小溪笑嘻嘻
  • 还行

资本论下的文化碰撞?失业的闲散工人终于为自己争取到了获得996福报的机会,但根本的价值观问题并没达成共识也未得到解决,所以也就是个短暂的喜剧。

38分钟前
  • 阿朴
  • 还行

33年前的《美国工厂》只不过从日本人变成了中国人

40分钟前
  • K7
  • 力荐

彭博商周20070305 Toyota's executives in Japan have used this film as an example of how not to manage American. MGT6503 wk09 Japanese management.

45分钟前
  • 启yd
  • 力荐

挺有感觉的,Ron的电影都这样吧。在主旋律的背景下保持了足够的冲突。

46分钟前
  • 春垓
  • 还行

上班迟到,下班早退,生点小病就不上班,个人比公司还重要。美国人太难管理了,事太多,不听话。感兴趣的可以看看纪录片《美国工厂》 American Factory (2019)。我觉得日本人管理企业的方式和中国比较像,0瑕疵,团结,集体至上,集体荣誉。在河里洗澡不觉得脏吗?日本人能做到,我们也能做到。

51分钟前
  • O型血
  • 还行

三十多年前的票房大卖的剧情版“日本工厂”,符号化的疯癫主角,和对亚洲人一成不变的刻板印象,让片子今日看来既无厘头又肤浅。Roger Ebert对此片的评论很精彩:Comedy shouldn't try to be funny; it should allow us to find the humor for ourselves.

55分钟前
  • slim
  • 很差

One eared elephant, haha, Japanese sense of humor.... 80年代的日企进军美国,历史写实,文化冲突下的融融其乐。Ron Howard 导演确实值得信赖。评:3.8星。

58分钟前
  • k-pax
  • 推荐

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved

Baidu
map