American Science Fiction author Michael Crichton’s second venture into filmmaking after dipping his toes in grinding out a futuristic WESTWORLD (1973) which is in dire urgency of a retrofit (here comes HBO’s popular TV series), COMA is not from his own novels, but transposed from his friend Robin Cook’s book (which also receives a TV re-interpretation in 2012), it cleverly taps into a paranoia-driven (our mortal fear about hospital and surgery), conspiracy theory routine that takes place in a major hospital in Boston and is headlined by our tenacious heroine Dr. Susan Wheeler (Bujold).
After her best friend Nancy (Chiles) succumbs to a brain-dead coma after a minor surgery, Susan acutely sniffs some goings-on on top of the statistic hokum of bad luck, her pursuance of the truth will duly encounter mounting resistance, butnothing can hold her back, neither the bureaucratic pressure nor a ruthless killer trailing her among the cadaver-riddled hospital rooms in the witching hour. She even goes out on a limb and sneaks into a formidable institution on her lonesome to finally solve the puzzle and miraculously finds an exit route. Yet, just when we are astounded by her moxie and wits, she predictably makes a fatal mistake and throws herself on the mercy of the vile ringleader to be silenced on the operation table by carbon monoxide poisoning, only to be rescued by her knight-in-shining armor in the eleventh hour, as an ostensibly female-centered trend-bucker, that final phallocratic deed is tastelessly self-defeating.
What is more excruciating is the portrait of the aforementioned knight, Susan’s boyfriend and colleague Dr. Mark Bellows, played bya flip Michael Douglas, often gratingly plays the contrarian whenever a stressed Susan propounds her theory, and Crichton rams the hovering question into his audience by implicating that he might be complicit in the whole backdoor human organ trafficking, simply to pull off the kicker and feather the movie’s deceitful macho nest, don’t forget, he is the one who would rather staying in his car and leaving Susan alone to visit the sinister-looking facility in the first place, plus, if he were really such a perfect dreamboat, it would not have taken him until that later phase to realize that something is amiss.
While it is the imagery of horizontally floating comatose patients (all young, fit bodies, for practical and aesthetic reasons), that chiefly subsists the film’s dimmed allure, there is no denying that apert and competent Ms. Bujold makes for a strikingly sympathetic heroine, in spite of Crichton’s carefully veiled comments on women liberation, as Mark frustratingly mutters, he should have fallen in love with a nurse instead, which strikes her as a frigid, lippy woman whose femininity is subdued by her own aptitude.
Finally, two supporting turns are worth singling out here, an authoritatively stern Rip Torn can always give us goosebumps even without uttering one single syllable; whereas a blink-refrainingElizabeth Ashley knows perfectly how to put impersonality to the fore, her Nurse Emerson could be intricately computer-manufactured herself, to more align with the drift of Crichton’s works.
referential film: Crichton’s WESTWORLD (1973, 5.7/10)
故事和结构还是可以的 速度慢了点 几个冲突没点破 年轻的道格拉斯没有演技啊 女主也是昙花一现
反乌托邦杰作,充分反映出那个年代美国人的心理焦虑和不安全感。最终这个阴谋的目的是什么已经不重要了,却有两点给人的印象极为深刻:一是女主角在探求事件的真相时表现出的勇气和行动力;二是整部影片的悬疑氛围给人留下的人人自危的感觉。新好莱坞真乃一座金矿,完全兼有思想深度和艺术风格。
78年的片子了,故事题材其实还不错,可是片子到一半怎么就这么水了,本来还挺悬疑的剧情怎么一下子就让人根本看不下去了,人物的设置与作为也傻得可以,观众用屁股都能猜出来谁是背后BOSS,女主居然还2B到亲身去自投罗网,不过道格拉斯年轻时还真挺帅气的,吊人那场景挺科幻挺经典的,现在还有片用!
很小的时候家里还用录像机的时候翻来覆去看过好多遍,一个非常大的房间里很多人通过一根管子漂浮在空中的画面震撼极了
迈克尔·克莱顿编导罗宾·库克畅销小说,迈克尔·道格拉斯主演,但迈克尔克莱顿虽然是好作家,却不是好导演,把个一波三折高潮迭起的故事拍得平平淡淡,女主角又选错人,找了文艺向的Genevieve Bujold,看着她实在紧张不起来。。。
Michael Crichton是描绘近未来恶梦的高手,观影过程始终保持着极强的压迫感,甚至可以容忍情节上的各种硬伤。通风管道和人体悬挂都是影响至今的经典场景。
小时候看的,当时觉得还不错,现在看2011年的新版
小时候2000年左右看的 竟然是78年的电影!!果然前卫!!!
节奏掌握的不是很好,略慢,没有显现出紧张的气氛。
大神早期就这么爱秀医学术语了.剧情简直鬼扯,不过混搭了女权运动后的时代色彩,70末做作的男女谈情桥段,道格拉斯年轻时很俊,tom selleck这酱油打得...
3.5,迈克尔·克莱顿总是怀念那些旧好莱坞的类型神话,即便在《昏迷》这部尝试将生命政治、阴谋论、女性主义等一切可能让《银幕》期刊偏爱的类元素混入一炉的政治惊悚片中,随着影片进入后半部分,配乐从阴沉的底轨突然间浮现,并控制影片的节奏之时,它便成为了另一部《西部世界》,动作取代空间作为主导机制,医院空间转变为一个充满技术装置的纪念碑谷———克莱顿甚至没有仿效最值得模仿的奥尔德里奇黑色电影。试问还有什么处理方法能比把政治电影的体制之恶简化为西部片般的追杀、对决更为愚蠢呢?比起设想邪恶的大他者,政治惊悚的恐怖感恰好来自于这个体制的中心是空无的,或者说没有一个具身的主体,正因如此,周遭的一切才可以被动员起来,不过好在结尾最后一个镜头足够复杂多义。
中字甚烂。Jerry Goldsmith很擅长这类惊悚配乐。00:41:30-00:44:30金毛Ed Harris XDDD
当时就奠定了我对悬疑片热爱的基础……
78年的片子拍的像90年代的,氛围控制的很好。这导演的职业生涯主要身份是编剧,对医疗行业熟稔,这个医疗黑幕主题的惊悚片还有些女权意识。不过整个故事顺下来有些不合理啊,男主迟钝的表现不矛盾么?
题材前卫,放到2022年也毫不过时。这种题材国内拍不了,好莱坞现在也不拍了。当医生掌握绝对权威,面对金钱利益时,病人就有彻底沦为摇钱树、小白鼠的风险(结合湘雅二院刘翔峰有感)。
70年代能有这样的创意是有多超前,想想去年某类似题材韩国电影还得到一些人共鸣,确实最近几年的韩国电影单从敢于自黑的角度来说还是很值得称道的。再说这部配乐不错,但是剧情张力不够,仅仅只靠几个设下的铺垫更直接说就是几个镜头来推进。PS:女主年轻的时候长的很像《行尸走肉》的玛姬.
还是在电影院看的 无聊的恐怖片
早期引进中国内地的一批外语电影之一,原版小说coma在美国1978年出版之时就已经是著名的畅销书。电影如今看来依旧有着令人引人入胜的节奏和氛围,充满着消毒水味的医院里似乎暗藏着什么神秘的阴谋,接二连三昏迷的病人令女医生不断生疑,然而越是深入的调查越是会受到无形阻力的警告。电影的情节现在看来比较简单,因此后面几十分钟都变成了女主角与反派猫捉老鼠般的追逐战,这在老惊悚片里也算是标准桥段了,现在看来实在老套。结局道格拉斯饰演的医生在千钧一发之际拯救女主角于危难之中,显得仓促而无趣。这部电影作为医疗题材惊悚片有一定的开创性,不过可看性早已随着时间的流逝而逐渐淡去。看看上译配音版也算是别有一番风味。
为Michael Douglas而看,情节一般想到了,没想到居然有这么多熟脸跑龙套,咕咕!
故事比较公式化,医学背景和阴森的研究室内景让人脊背发凉,两段深入虎穴的冒险戏拍的出色